Judicial review is a vital part of modern legal systems, ensuring that laws and actions by public authorities are reasonable and lawful. However, one key question often arises: Can you judicially review primary legislation? In this article, we’ll explore what judicial review is, its limits, and whether primary legislation can be challenged through this legal process. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone interested in law and governance, as it touches on the balance between legislative power and judicial oversight.
What is Judicial Review?
Judicial review allows courts to examine the legality of actions taken by public authorities, including government ministers, agencies, and local authorities. It ensures that these actions align with the law and the constitution. Judicial review is a form of control over how power is exercised by public bodies, preventing arbitrary or unlawful decisions.
The concept arose from common law and has been a key part of many legal systems, particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States. Courts, through judicial review, assess whether a decision made by a public authority is within its legal powers. The key question in judicial review is whether the authority has acted within its statutory boundaries.
Primary Legislation and Its Role
Primary legislation refers to laws passed by the legislature, such as Acts of Parliament in the UK or statutes in other countries. These are the main laws created by a parliament or a legislature and hold the highest legal authority. For example, the UK Parliament passes acts like the Human Rights Act or the Equality Act, which form the backbone of the legal system.
Primary legislation is superior to secondary legislation (also known as delegated or subordinate legislation). Secondary legislation involves more detailed rules or regulations created under the authority of primary legislation. The key difference is that primary legislation often represents the will of the people, expressed through elected representatives.
Can Primary Legislation Be Judicially Reviewed?
In most legal systems, primary legislation is generally not subject to judicial review. This principle is based on the concept of parliamentary sovereignty (or legislative supremacy in some jurisdictions), which holds that the legislature is the supreme law-making body and cannot be overridden by the courts.
In countries like the UK, judicial review does not extend to primary legislation, meaning courts cannot declare acts of Parliament invalid. This is in line with the idea that Parliament, as an elected body, is the ultimate decision-maker when it comes to making laws. As such, courts will not assess the merits of primary legislation, but only examine whether its application by public authorities is lawful.
Exceptions and Limitations to Judicial Review of Primary Legislation
While judicial review of primary legislation is typically not possible, there are some exceptions or cases where limited review may occur. For instance:
Constitutional or Human Rights Violations: If a piece of primary legislation conflicts with the constitution or violates fundamental human rights, it may be challenged. In some jurisdictions, courts may declare that certain parts of primary legislation are incompatible with human rights law.
European Union Law and International Law: In the UK, before Brexit, courts could judicially review primary legislation to ensure compliance with European Union law. Similarly, international treaties or conventions may sometimes override domestic primary legislation, although this depends on the legal framework of each jurisdiction.
Interpretation of Legislation: In certain circumstances, the courts may review how primary legislation is interpreted and applied. Courts often play an important role in interpreting statutes, and their decisions can affect the implementation of primary laws. This is not a review of the legality of the legislation itself but rather how it should be understood.
Declarations of Incompatibility: In the UK, courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility under the Human Rights Act 1998. This does not invalidate primary legislation but notifies Parliament if a law is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Parliament can then decide whether to amend the law.
Judicial Review of Secondary Legislation vs Primary Legislation
In contrast to primary legislation, secondary legislation is often subject to judicial review. Since secondary legislation is created by an authority under the powers granted by primary legislation, courts can review whether such regulations exceed the powers granted or violate constitutional principles.
Judicial review of secondary legislation is a common way to challenge the way laws are applied in practice. Courts assess whether secondary legislation stays within the limits of the authority provided by the parent Act. If the secondary legislation is found to be ultra vires (beyond the powers granted), it can be annulled or altered.
Why Can’t Primary Legislation Be Reviewed?
The main reason primary legislation is generally beyond the reach of judicial review is parliamentary sovereignty. This doctrine means that Parliament, as the supreme law-making body, cannot be overruled by the judiciary. Courts can interpret laws and ensure they are applied fairly, but they do not have the power to strike down laws passed by an elected parliament.
In countries like the United Kingdom, where parliamentary sovereignty is a fundamental principle, any challenge to primary legislation would require a change to the constitution. The judiciary, therefore, is limited to applying the law as it stands, rather than overturning it.
Can Judicial Review of Primary Legislation Ever Happen?
There are some theoretical situations in which judicial review of primary legislation could occur:
Constitutional Challenges: In some countries, such as the United States, courts may have the power to review primary legislation (federal laws or acts of Congress) if it is found to violate the constitution.
Evolving Legal Theories: New legal theories or evolving political landscapes may lead to challenges that could prompt courts to reconsider the traditional boundaries of judicial review. However, such cases are rare and usually require significant constitutional change.
Conclusion
While primary legislation is generally beyond the reach of judicial review due to the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, there are exceptions. Courts can issue declarations of incompatibility, especially regarding human rights, and may review primary legislation in light of constitutional principles or international law. However, the fundamental idea remains that the legislature is supreme and its decisions cannot be overridden by the judiciary.
Judicial review is crucial for ensuring government accountability, but it operates within certain boundaries when it comes to primary legislation. This delicate balance between the power of Parliament and the role of the judiciary helps maintain the integrity of the legal system.
FAQs About Judicial Review
Can a court overturn primary legislation?
Generally, no. Primary legislation is considered outside the scope of judicial review in many jurisdictions due to the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
What is the difference between primary and secondary legislation?
Primary legislation is created by Parliament or the legislature, while secondary legislation is created by an authority under the powers granted by primary legislation.
Can primary legislation be reviewed for human rights violations?
In some jurisdictions, courts may issue a declaration of incompatibility if primary legislation violates human rights, but they cannot strike it down.
What is a declaration of incompatibility?
A declaration of incompatibility is when a court in the UK states that a law is inconsistent with the European Convention on Human Rights, but the law remains in force unless Parliament changes it.
Can courts review government actions under primary legislation?
Yes, courts can review how primary legislation is applied by government agencies to ensure that decisions are made within the legal framework.
Can judicial review ever change primary legislation?
While courts cannot directly strike down primary legislation, they can challenge how it is applied, potentially leading to legislative reform if issues are identified.
Related articles: