In a significant legal development, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has dismissed its lawsuit against Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, a subsidiary of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. The suit, originally filed in January, accused the Tennessee-based lender of pushing borrowers into home loans they were unable to afford, leading to late fees, penalties, home repossessions, and bankruptcies.
The CFPB’s decision to voluntarily drop the case comes amid a broader shift in the agency’s enforcement actions, which has seen several high-profile dismissals. This move aligns with the current administration’s agenda to limit the CFPB’s regulatory scope, a stance that echoes President Donald Trump’s efforts to dismantle the agency, which was originally established in 2010 during the Obama administration.
Along with the Vanderbilt case, the CFPB dismissed other significant lawsuits, including one against Capital One, which were all filed with prejudice. This means that the agency cannot revive these cases in the future.
The original complaint against Vanderbilt Mortgage accused the company of violating the federal Truth in Lending Act. The CFPB alleged that Vanderbilt ignored clear warnings that borrowers could not afford their loans, which ultimately led to financial distress for many of its customers.
Vanderbilt, which operates under the umbrella of Clayton Homes, the largest builder of manufactured homes in the U.S., has not commented on the dismissal. Clayton Homes specializes in providing homes to buyers with lower credit scores or those residing in rural areas. Despite recent challenges, including a rise in loan-related losses and homeowner insurance claims, Clayton’s 2024 revenue saw an increase of over 8%, reaching $12.4 billion.
This dismissal signals a notable shift in the regulatory landscape, particularly regarding consumer protection laws related to housing and finance. While the CFPB has recently curbed its enforcement actions, industry observers remain cautious, noting that these developments may affect how similar cases are handled moving forward.
Read more: