Florida is considering a major shift in its approach to legal education, as the state’s Supreme Court explores the possibility of dropping the American Bar Association’s (ABA) requirement for graduates of ABA-accredited law schools to sit for the Florida bar exam.
This development comes in response to the ABA’s controversial diversity and inclusion rule for law schools, which has become a focal point of debate nationwide.
On Wednesday, the all-Republican Florida Supreme Court appointed a workgroup tasked with reviewing the ABA’s accreditation standards and proposing alternative pathways for bar exam eligibility.
The workgroup is expected to submit its findings by September 30, offering potential solutions for the state’s legal education system moving forward.
The ABA’s diversity and inclusion mandate requires law schools to offer “full opportunities” to racial and ethnic minorities and foster a diverse student body in terms of gender, race, and ethnicity.
While the ABA recently suspended enforcement of this rule, waiting for updated guidance from the U.S. Department of Education, the mandate has faced backlash from critics. Florida’s Attorney General, Pam Bondi, along with other Republican leaders, has voiced strong opposition, labeling the rule as discriminatory.
The Florida Supreme Court has raised concerns about the impact of the ABA’s diversity rule, questioning its effectiveness in law school accreditation and whether it leads to inflated costs for legal education, while potentially stifling innovation.
The court also pointed to broader criticisms of the ABA’s political involvement, sparking a wider debate about the organization’s role in shaping legal education standards.
With 12 ABA-accredited law schools and the third-largest number of bar examinees in the U.S., Florida’s decision could have significant implications for the future of legal education across the country. The ABA has held the role of sole accreditor of law schools in Florida since 1992.
The move to reconsider ABA accreditation comes amid growing tensions between state and national legal institutions. The ABA has faced attacks from the Trump administration in recent weeks, with a spokesperson referring to it as a “board of snooty, leftist lawyers.”
Further pressure has mounted from Florida, where Bondi recently threatened to revoke the ABA’s government designation as the accreditor of U.S. law schools due to its diversity policies.
This is not the first time Florida has moved away from diversity initiatives in the legal sector. Since 2021, the Florida Supreme Court has taken steps to eliminate legal diversity programs, including halting funding for diversity initiatives within the Florida Bar and removing diversity training from the list of eligible topics for continuing legal education.
As Florida evaluates its relationship with the ABA, the legal community will be watching closely to see how this debate evolves, especially in light of broader discussions about diversity, inclusion, and the future of legal education in the United States.
Read more: